Could Ubuntu Become a Counter-Narrative to Militarized Security Doctrines?
Modern security doctrine is heavily militarized. States measure safety in terms of force projection, deterrence capacity, technological superiority, and alliance strength. Defense budgets expand in response to perceived threats; strategic doctrines prioritize readiness for conflict escalation. Military alliances such as NATO exemplify collective deterrence frameworks built around the premise that credible force prevents aggression. Against this backdrop, Ubuntu—a relational ethic rooted in interdependence and shared humanity—appears conceptually distant from the grammar of militarized security. Yet the question is not whether Ubuntu can replace armed defense structures. It is whether it can function as a counter-narrative: reframing how security itself is defined, prioritized, and operationalized. To evaluate this possibility, we must examine three domains: the philosophical foundations of militarized security, the conceptual content of Ubuntu, and the structural conditions of c...