Posts

Are Tribal Divisions a Result of Colonial Legacies, or Do They Persist Due to Deliberate Elite Manipulation?

Image
  The Question of Africa’s Divided Unity Tribal divisions across Africa are both an old inheritance and a new invention — an uneasy marriage between history and manipulation. While colonialism laid the foundation for ethnic fragmentation by drawing arbitrary borders and privileging some groups over others, it is Africa’s postcolonial elites who have kept those divisions alive, often turning them into instruments of political survival. The question, therefore, is not whether tribal divisions come from colonial legacies or elite manipulation — both forces are deeply intertwined. The colonial state created the framework, and the postcolonial elite mastered its use. To understand how, one must trace the journey of tribal identity from precolonial harmony through colonial distortion to modern-day exploitation. 1. Before the Colonizers: Ethnicity as Identity, Not Division Before European conquest, Africa’s diverse ethnic groups were not “tribes” in the colonial sense but living soc...

Has Christianity in the West become too individualized to sustain strong fellowship structures?

Image
  In large measure, yes. Christianity in the West has become so deeply individualized that it struggles to sustain strong, binding fellowship structures. This shift has altered not only how belief is expressed, but how Christian communities function, endure, and transmit faith. 1. The triumph of the autonomous self Western culture is built on the primacy of individual autonomy—personal choice, self-definition, and subjective meaning. Christianity, once understood as a communal way of life governed by shared doctrine and mutual accountability, has been recast as a private spiritual preference. Faith is treated as something one has rather than something one belongs to . This undermines the social glue required for durable fellowship. 2. From covenant community to voluntary association Historically, the church functioned as a covenantal body: membership implied obligation, discipline, and shared moral standards. In the contemporary West, churches operate more like voluntary assoc...

Africa’s Institutions Compared with ASEAN, the EU, and NATO

Image
  Comparative analysis of Africa’s continental and regional institutions alongside ASEAN, the European Union (EU), and NATO , focusing on purpose, power, funding, enforcement, sovereignty, and outcomes . The comparison is not meant to idealize any model, but to expose why Africa’s institutions underperform structurally , and what lessons—both positive and negative—can realistically be drawn. Africa’s Institutions Compared with ASEAN, the EU, and NATO Why Structure, Incentives, and Power—Not Rhetoric—Determine Effectiveness 1. Foundational Purpose and Strategic Clarity African Union (AU) and Regional Economic Communities (RECs) Africa’s institutions were born primarily from anti-colonial solidarity and the desire to preserve state sovereignty after independence . The Organization of African Unity (OAU), and later the AU, prioritized: Territorial integrity Non-interference Diplomatic unity While historically understandable, this legacy produced institutions design...

How Often Have Counterterrorism Missions Historically Evolved into Broader Geopolitical Interventions?

Image
  From “Limited Missions” to Strategic Entrenchment Counterterrorism missions are almost always framed as narrow, technical, and time-bound . Governments present them as defensive responses to non-state threats, designed to restore stability, protect civilians, or assist allies. Yet history shows a persistent pattern: counterterrorism operations frequently expand beyond their original mandate , evolving into long-term geopolitical interventions with consequences far exceeding the initial justification. This evolution is not accidental. It is structural. Once military forces, intelligence assets, logistics networks, and diplomatic commitments are established, counterterrorism becomes a gateway to power projection, regional influence, and strategic competition . The question is not whether such missions expand, but how often—and under what conditions—they do so . Historically, the answer is: very often . 1. Afghanistan: The Archetypal Case of Mission Expansion No case better i...

The Man Who Measured Wealth Backwards.

Image
  The Man Who Measured Wealth Backwards.   A rich man counted his wealth by what he gave away.  When he died, his children argued over his possessions— until they found his final note: “I already spent the real wealth on people.”   Core lesson: True wealth is impact. Expansion angle:  Greed vs generosity, family values. In the hill city of Kambara lived a man everyone called wealthy, though few agreed on why. His house was large but plain. His clothes were clean but unremarkable. He owned land, yes—but much of it he had quietly signed over to others. When asked how much he was worth, he never named a number. He would only smile and say, “I count from the other end.” People laughed, thinking it modesty or riddles. But the man— Tariq —kept careful records. Each night, by lamplight, he opened a small leather book. Inside were no lists of properties or coins. Instead, there were names. A widow whose shop he rebuilt after a fire. A boy whose schooling he pa...

Ubuntu & Global Power Structures- Can Ubuntu realistically influence a world order built on power asymmetry?

Image
  The modern international system is structurally hierarchical. Power is unevenly distributed across military capability, technological sophistication, financial leverage, and narrative dominance. From the institutional architecture of the United Nations to the weighted voting systems of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank , global governance reflects asymmetry rather than parity. Within such a system, the question arises: can a relational ethical philosophy like Ubuntu meaningfully influence a world order structured around strategic competition and material power? To answer this, one must clarify both terms. Ubuntu, often summarized as “I am because we are,” is not merely cultural sentiment. It is an ontological claim about personhood and interdependence. It asserts that dignity is relational, that community precedes individualism, and that legitimacy derives from reciprocity. Global power structures, by contrast, are largely shaped by realist assumptions: states pur...