Are EVs Truly the End of Oil, or Just a Rebranding of Energy Dependence?

 

Electric vehicles (EVs) are widely portrayed as the technology that will finally break humanity’s dependence on oil. Governments announce future bans on petrol cars, automakers commit billions to electrification, and climate discourse increasingly frames EVs as the moral and practical successor to internal combustion engines. In this narrative, oil fades into irrelevance while clean electricity powers a sustainable future.

Yet when examined beyond slogans and sales charts, the claim that EVs mark “the end of oil” becomes far less certain. What emerges instead is a more complex reality: EVs may reduce direct oil consumption in transport, but they do not eliminate energy dependence. In many respects, they rebrand it—shifting dependence from oil wells to mines, refineries, power grids, and geopolitical chokepoints that are often less visible but no less consequential.

1. Oil Is More Than Fuel

The idea that EVs will end oil dependence assumes oil is primarily a transport fuel. In reality, oil underpins modern civilization far beyond petrol and diesel. Plastics, synthetic rubber, lubricants, pharmaceuticals, fertilizers, solvents, and countless industrial inputs are petroleum-derived.

EVs themselves are oil-intensive products. From plastics in interiors and insulation to synthetic materials in tires and wiring, oil remains embedded in vehicle manufacturing. Even if every car were electric, global oil demand would not disappear; it would be reshaped.

Thus, EV adoption challenges one use of oil but does not eliminate oil as a strategic resource.

2. Electricity Is Not Energy Independence

EVs replace liquid fuel with electricity, but electricity is not a primary energy source—it is a carrier. The question then becomes: where does the electricity come from?

In many countries, electricity generation still relies heavily on fossil fuels—coal, natural gas, and oil. In such systems, EVs shift energy consumption from petrol pumps to power plants. Oil demand may decline in transport, but fossil fuel dependence persists elsewhere in the system.

Even in grids with growing renewable shares, intermittency requires backup generation, often gas- or oil-based. Without large-scale storage and grid resilience, EVs remain tethered to fossil fuel systems indirectly.

3. The Rise of Mineral Dependence

If EVs weaken oil dependence, they intensify dependence on critical minerals. Lithium, cobalt, nickel, manganese, graphite, copper, and rare earth elements form the backbone of batteries, motors, and power electronics.

Unlike oil, which is globally distributed and traded, many of these minerals are geographically concentrated and politically sensitive. Extraction often occurs in a few countries, while refining and processing are even more centralized.

This creates a new dependency structure:

  • Resource-rich but low-processing countries capture limited value.

  • Processing and manufacturing hubs gain strategic leverage.

  • Import-dependent countries swap oil vulnerability for mineral vulnerability.

In this sense, EVs do not eliminate dependence; they reallocate it.

4. Oil vs. Batteries: Liquidity and Flexibility

Oil’s dominance has always rested on its unmatched energy density, storability, and transportability. It can be stockpiled, shipped, traded, and used on demand with minimal infrastructure complexity.

Electricity and batteries lack this flexibility. Large-scale storage remains expensive, and grid failures immediately disrupt mobility. Where oil offers energy liquidity, EV systems demand stability and coordination across grids, chargers, software, and supply chains.

This makes EV-based mobility more system-dependent and potentially more fragile, especially in regions with weak infrastructure or political instability.

5. Corporate Power: From Oil Majors to Battery and Grid Giants

The transition to EVs is often framed as a shift away from powerful oil corporations. In reality, it may simply replace one set of dominant actors with another.

Battery manufacturers, mining conglomerates, utilities, grid operators, and technology firms increasingly control key nodes of the EV ecosystem. Intellectual property, software platforms, and charging standards concentrate power in fewer hands.

Consumers may no longer depend on oil companies—but they become dependent on battery supply chains, grid pricing, software updates, and infrastructure access. Energy dependence does not disappear; it changes ownership.

6. Geopolitics: Fewer Wars, Different Pressures

Optimists argue that EVs will reduce conflict by eliminating oil-driven geopolitics. While reduced oil demand may ease some tensions, mineral and electricity geopolitics introduce new risks.

Competition over lithium reserves, refining capacity, semiconductor supply, and grid technologies already shapes diplomatic and trade relations. Sanctions, export controls, and industrial policy increasingly target these sectors.

Moreover, electricity dependence ties mobility to domestic grid resilience. Cyberattacks, grid failures, or political manipulation of energy pricing can disrupt transport at scale—something oil-based systems are more insulated against.

7. The Developing World Reality

For much of the developing world, EVs do not represent liberation from oil dependence. Many countries import EVs, batteries, and charging equipment while exporting raw materials. Electricity grids remain fossil-fuel-based, and oil is still needed for generators, transport, and industry.

In such contexts, EVs risk deepening dependency rather than reducing it—substituting visible oil imports with less visible but equally strategic dependencies on foreign technology and materials.

8. Oil’s Decline Will Be Relative, Not Absolute

EVs will likely reduce oil demand growth and eventually contribute to a plateau or gradual decline in transport fuel use in some regions. But “the end of oil” is a misleading phrase.

Oil’s role will shift:

  • Less dominant in passenger vehicles in wealthy countries

  • Still critical in aviation, shipping, heavy industry, chemicals, and agriculture

  • Embedded in manufacturing, infrastructure, and global trade

EVs change oil’s profile, not its existence.

9. The Illusion of Clean Breaks

History shows that energy transitions are additive and slow. Coal did not disappear with oil; oil did not disappear with gas. Each new energy system layers onto the old one, reshaping power structures rather than erasing them.

EVs follow this pattern. They are not a clean break from oil but part of a broader reconfiguration of energy dependence—one that blends fossil fuels, renewables, minerals, and digital systems into a more complex whole.

Conclusion: Rebranding, Not Erasure

EVs are not truly the end of oil. They are the end of oil’s monopoly over mobility in certain contexts. What replaces it is not independence, but a new web of dependencies—on minerals, electricity, grids, software, and geopolitics.

This does not make EVs pointless or deceptive. It means they should be understood realistically. Energy transitions are not moral victories; they are power reallocations. The critical question is not whether oil disappears, but who controls the new dependencies and how resilient, equitable, and transparent those systems are.

In that light, EVs are less a story of emancipation from energy dependence and more a story of how dependence is being redesigned for the 21st century.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why are machine tools considered the “mother industry” for industrialization, and what does this mean for Africa and other developing economies?

Image
  Machine Tools: The “Mother Industry” of Industrialization and What It Means for Africa and Developing Economies When economists, engineers, and policymakers speak of machine tools as the “mother industry” , they refer to the pivotal role these tools play in building every other industry. Just as mothers give birth to life, machine tools give birth to manufacturing. They are the foundation upon which industrial capacity rests, and without them, no nation can claim full industrial independence. For Africa and other developing economies striving for sustainable growth, this understanding is critical. What Are Machine Tools? Machine tools are mechanical devices used to cut, shape, drill, grind, or otherwise process metal and other hard materials into components. Examples include lathes, milling machines, grinders, presses, and CNC (computer numerical control) machines. These tools are essential for producing the parts that go into cars, airplanes, energy systems, agricultural machine...
Read more

It's now clear the west particularly America and European elites have been using democracy and capitalism to control and create sanctions on the developing and poor countries

Image
  To assess it rigorously, we need to separate three analytical layers: Normative ideology (democracy, capitalism as principles) Policy practice (how powerful states implement them externally) Geopolitical power behavior (how dominant states act regardless of ideology) Let’s examine this carefully. 1. Democracy as Principle vs. Democracy as Instrument Democracy, as theorized by thinkers like John Locke and Montesquieu , is grounded in: Popular sovereignty Rule of law Civil liberties Accountability However, critics argue that major powers — especially the United States and blocs like the European Union — sometimes apply democracy selectively in foreign policy. Examples often cited: Support for authoritarian allies when strategically convenient. Sanctions justified on “democratic grounds” but aligned with geopolitical interests. Military interventions framed as democracy promotion. This suggests inconsistency — not necessarily that democracy its...
Read more

Why Petrol Cars Still Dominate in Most of the World—Despite EV Hype

Image
The global narrative around electric vehicles (EVs) suggests an unstoppable march toward an all-electric future. Headlines highlight rising EV sales in wealthy countries, bold government bans on petrol cars, and ambitious climate pledges from automakers. Yet step outside a few high-income markets and the picture changes dramatically. In most of the world—across Africa, South and Southeast Asia, Latin America, and large parts of Eastern Europe—petrol (and diesel) cars continue to dominate roads, sales, and consumer preferences. This persistence is not simply due to resistance to change or lack of awareness. It reflects deep structural realities: economics, infrastructure, energy systems, industrial capacity, and social behavior. Understanding why petrol cars remain dominant requires moving beyond hype and examining how mobility actually works for the majority of the global population. 1. Cost: The Decisive Barrier The most immediate and decisive factor is price . EVs remain significantl...
Read more