Is the presidency of Donald Trump influencing authoritarian tendencies globally—particularly in Africa?

By

 


To assess this properly, we need analytical clarity rather than rhetorical framing. Authoritarianism does not spread through personality alone. It spreads through incentives, institutional erosion, and geopolitical signaling.

Below is a structured analysis.

I. What Is “Authoritarian Drift”?

In political science, authoritarian drift refers to:

  • Weakening judicial independence

  • Politicizing security forces

  • Undermining electoral integrity

  • Concentrating executive power

  • Delegitimizing media

  • Extending tenure beyond constitutional norms

This phenomenon has been documented globally over the last 15 years—not beginning with Trump.

Scholars often cite:

  • Democratic backsliding in Eastern Europe

  • Executive aggrandizement in parts of Latin America

  • Entrenched incumbency in several African states

So the trend predates and exceeds any single U.S. administration.

II. Did Trump Normalize Executive Aggression?

Trump’s presidency was marked by:

  • Confrontational rhetoric toward media

  • Aggressive use of executive authority

  • Skepticism toward multilateral institutions

  • Rejection of certain democratic norms

Supporters frame this as populist disruption.
Critics frame it as institutional erosion.

The key question: Did this behavior create global permission structures for strongman politics?

There are three mechanisms through which that could occur:

1. Norm Signaling

When the leader of a historically influential democracy attacks institutions (courts, media, elections), it weakens the moral leverage of that democracy abroad.

2. Diplomatic De-Prioritization

If human rights and democratic governance become secondary to transactional diplomacy, elites in other countries face less external pressure.

3. Narrative Legitimization

Populist rhetoric about “fake news,” “deep state,” and electoral fraud has been echoed by leaders worldwide.

But correlation is not causation. We must avoid over-attribution.

III. African Political Dynamics: Internal vs. External Drivers

In Africa, executive entrenchment is influenced primarily by:

  • Weak institutional checks and balances

  • Patronage-based political economies

  • Control over security forces

  • Constitutional manipulation for term extensions

  • Resource dependency

Examples across the continent show patterns of:

  • Term-limit removal

  • Electoral irregularities

  • Constitutional reinterpretation

These trends began long before Trump’s presidency.

External influence plays a role—but domestic institutional design and political culture are primary drivers.

IV. Did U.S. Posture Shift Under Trump?

Under Trump, U.S. foreign policy often emphasized:

  • Sovereignty over multilateral pressure

  • Reduced emphasis on democracy promotion

  • Strategic competition (especially with China)

When democracy promotion is deprioritized, authoritarian-leaning leaders face less public pressure from Washington.

However, this shift did not eliminate U.S. institutional capacity to sanction or criticize governance abuses. Sanctions regimes and aid conditionalities continued in some cases.

The broader geopolitical context also matters:

  • China’s infrastructure diplomacy model

  • Russia’s security partnerships

  • Gulf state financial influence

These actors provide alternative alliances not contingent on democratic reform.

V. The “Strongman Emulation” Thesis

There is a theory in comparative politics that strong leaders imitate other powerful leaders to justify their own concentration of authority.

But for emulation to occur, three conditions must exist:

  1. Domestic elite incentives align with power consolidation.

  2. Institutions are weak enough to permit it.

  3. Public legitimacy can be maintained (through nationalism, economic growth, or repression).

African leaders do not require American precedent to consolidate power; many systems already possess structural vulnerabilities.

VI. The Danger of Oversimplification

It is analytically risky to claim:

“Trump created authoritarianism in Africa.”

That framing assumes:

  • African political actors lack agency.

  • Domestic institutions are passive.

  • Global trends are unidirectional from Washington.

Authoritarian drift in Africa has roots in:

  • Post-colonial state formation challenges

  • Military-political legacies

  • Centralized economic control

  • Constitutional fragility

These structural dynamics precede recent U.S. administrations.

VII. Where Influence May Exist

More cautiously, one could argue:

  • When the United States appears internally polarized and institutionally strained, its democratic model loses normative authority.

  • When powerful democracies appear unstable, leaders elsewhere can justify executive consolidation as “necessary.”

Global democratic credibility matters.

If U.S. institutions withstand internal strain and enforce accountability, the signal strengthens rule-of-law norms globally.

If they fail, it weakens normative pressure abroad.

VIII. The Deeper Question: Is Democracy in Retreat Globally?

According to multiple democracy indexes (Freedom House, V-Dem), democratic backsliding has been occurring globally for over a decade.

Drivers include:

  • Digital disinformation

  • Economic inequality

  • Populist mobilization

  • Security crises

  • Institutional fatigue

Trump was part of this era—but not its origin.

IX. Africa’s Real Accountability Challenge

In many African states, the core issue is not foreign influence. It is:

  • Weak separation of powers

  • Lack of judicial independence

  • Security forces aligned with incumbents

  • Patronage networks tied to state resources

Authoritarian resilience thrives where:

  • Opposition cannot organize freely

  • Media lacks independence

  • Civil society faces restriction

These conditions are internally generated.

Did Trump’s presidency symbolically embolden populist or executive-heavy governance globally?

Possibly at the level of rhetoric and norm signaling.

Did it create authoritarianism in Africa?
No. The structural drivers are domestic and historically rooted.

The more accurate framing is:

Global democratic norms weakened during a period of geopolitical fragmentation. The United States, under multiple administrations, has struggled to project consistent democratic leadership.

Authoritarian drift is multi-causal. It is not exported like a product. It emerges where institutions are fragile and power incentives favor consolidation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Why are machine tools considered the “mother industry” for industrialization, and what does this mean for Africa and other developing economies?

By
Image
  Machine Tools: The “Mother Industry” of Industrialization and What It Means for Africa and Developing Economies When economists, engineers, and policymakers speak of machine tools as the “mother industry” , they refer to the pivotal role these tools play in building every other industry. Just as mothers give birth to life, machine tools give birth to manufacturing. They are the foundation upon which industrial capacity rests, and without them, no nation can claim full industrial independence. For Africa and other developing economies striving for sustainable growth, this understanding is critical. What Are Machine Tools? Machine tools are mechanical devices used to cut, shape, drill, grind, or otherwise process metal and other hard materials into components. Examples include lathes, milling machines, grinders, presses, and CNC (computer numerical control) machines. These tools are essential for producing the parts that go into cars, airplanes, energy systems, agricultural machine...
Read more

Quantum computing, decentralized energy and Ai-driven autonomous weapons will in control.

By
Image
  1. Whether quantum computing destabilizes all current deterrence models.   2. Whether decentralized energy microgrids undermine state-level energy leverage.   3. whether AI-driven autonomous weapons lower the threshold for global conflict.                Could Quantum Computing Destabilize All Current Deterrence Models? A. Quantum Computing’s Strategic Potential Quantum computing (QC) promises: Breaking current encryption (RSA, ECC) Ultra-fast optimization of logistics and supply chains Simulation of complex systems (e.g., nuclear reactions) Enhanced AI training efficiency Immediate strategic implications : Cryptography : Current nuclear command-and-control relies heavily on secure communications. QC could make conventional encryption obsolete. Missile Defense : Quantum-enhanced optimization could allow more precise interception simulations, potentially undermining confidence in current missile det...
Read more

Would Great Powers Accept Relational Accountability Over Strategic Dominance?

By
Image
  At the core of international politics lies a persistent tension: are great powers primarily guardians of order or maximizers of advantage? The modern state system, especially since 1945, has been structured around strategic dominance—military deterrence, economic leverage, technological supremacy, and geopolitical positioning. Relational accountability, by contrast, demands that powerful actors accept responsibility for how their actions affect weaker states and the broader global community. It requires constraint, reciprocity, and moral transparency. The critical question is not whether relational accountability is ethically desirable. It is whether great powers—given structural incentives—would rationally accept it over dominance. 1. The Logic of Strategic Dominance Great powers operate within an anarchic international system. There is no global sovereign capable of enforcing universal rules. Institutions such as the United Nations exist, but enforcement ultimately depends...
Read more

It's now clear the west particularly America and European elites have been using democracy and capitalism to control and create sanctions on the developing and poor countries

By
Image
  To assess it rigorously, we need to separate three analytical layers: Normative ideology (democracy, capitalism as principles) Policy practice (how powerful states implement them externally) Geopolitical power behavior (how dominant states act regardless of ideology) Let’s examine this carefully. 1. Democracy as Principle vs. Democracy as Instrument Democracy, as theorized by thinkers like John Locke and Montesquieu , is grounded in: Popular sovereignty Rule of law Civil liberties Accountability However, critics argue that major powers — especially the United States and blocs like the European Union — sometimes apply democracy selectively in foreign policy. Examples often cited: Support for authoritarian allies when strategically convenient. Sanctions justified on “democratic grounds” but aligned with geopolitical interests. Military interventions framed as democracy promotion. This suggests inconsistency — not necessarily that democracy its...
Read more

Why Petrol Cars Still Dominate in Most of the World—Despite EV Hype

By
Image
The global narrative around electric vehicles (EVs) suggests an unstoppable march toward an all-electric future. Headlines highlight rising EV sales in wealthy countries, bold government bans on petrol cars, and ambitious climate pledges from automakers. Yet step outside a few high-income markets and the picture changes dramatically. In most of the world—across Africa, South and Southeast Asia, Latin America, and large parts of Eastern Europe—petrol (and diesel) cars continue to dominate roads, sales, and consumer preferences. This persistence is not simply due to resistance to change or lack of awareness. It reflects deep structural realities: economics, infrastructure, energy systems, industrial capacity, and social behavior. Understanding why petrol cars remain dominant requires moving beyond hype and examining how mobility actually works for the majority of the global population. 1. Cost: The Decisive Barrier The most immediate and decisive factor is price . EVs remain significantl...
Read more