ubuntusafa.com

Whether Africa can become a pole rather than an arena.   Whether Europe could eventually detach from U.S. nuclear dependence.                                                                     PART I Can Africa Become a Pole Rather Than an Arena? To function as a pole in a multipolar system, an actor must possess: Economic gravity Military deterrence capacity Technological-industrial base Institutional coherence Narrative legitimacy Currently, Africa is strategically contested by: United States China European Union Russia India That makes Africa an arena. To become a pole, it must consolidate power internally.  Economic Threshold Africa’s combined GDP is significant, but fragmented across 54 states. The African Union and the African Continental Free Trade Area ...

  Let's analyze:   Whether Africa benefits more from multipolarity or bipolarity.   Whether China actually prefers a weak or strong Europe.   Or whether NATO fragmentation becomes likely by 2040.                        Does Africa Benefit More from Multipolarity or Bipolarity? We must first clarify what “benefit” means: Policy sovereignty? Economic growth? Security stability? Bargaining power? Africa’s position in the global system is not that of a pole, but of a strategic arena . Key external actors include: United States China European Union Russia India A. Under Bipolarity In a strict bipolar system: Two dominant blocs. Limited diplomatic flexibility. Alignment pressure on weaker states. Historical example: Cold War Africa. During U.S.–Soviet rivalry: Some African states leveraged superpower competition for aid. Others became proxy bat...

                                                                  PART I- Does Multipolarity Increase Peace or Instability? Multipolarity refers to a distribution of power where three or more major powers shape the international system. Today’s emerging poles include: United States China European Union Russia Rising actors such as India Historically, the structure of polarity affects stability. Historical Record A. Bipolar Stability (Cold War Model) During the Cold War: Two superpowers. Clear deterrence logic. Alliance discipline. High predictability. The rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union created proxy wars, but direct war between them was avoided due to nuclear deterrence clarity. Bipolar systems tend to: Be rigid but predictable. Reduce miscalculation. ...

                              Realist International Relations Lens Realism assumes: States are primary actors. The international system is anarchic (no global sovereign). Survival and power outweigh moral claims. Trust is secondary to capability. From a realist standpoint, the war between Russia and Ukraine is fundamentally about security architecture in Eastern Europe , not ideology. A. How Realists View the EU The European Union is not a unified military actor but a hybrid political-economic bloc. Realists would argue: EU elites are managing a balance-of-power crisis. Russia challenges NATO’s eastward expansion. The EU’s survival depends on U.S. security guarantees. Simultaneously, Europe depends economically on China . This creates a strategic triangle : Security Economic Geopolitical US China Russia Realism says: You cannot afford to antagonize two poles simultaneously. ...

  If EU members knows China could help the war between Ukraine and Russia but can't put it directly diplomatically or otherwise and can't because they're also ripping benefits from the war.  Does it mean EU-elites are so scared of China's reaction in terms of economic response.  Who's fooling who?  First, we need to separate three actors: The European Union China Russia and Ukraine Now let’s examine the core claims embedded in your question. 1. Could China realistically “help end” the war? China has leverage over Russia in three areas: Trade dependency – After Western sanctions, Russia became more dependent on Chinese markets. Energy purchases – China buys discounted Russian oil and gas. Technology channels – Dual-use goods flow indirectly. However, leverage is not the same as control. China’s strategic interest is: Prevent Russia’s collapse. Avoid direct sanctions on itself. Maintain trade with Europe. Position itself as ...