Skip to main content

How the White House Is Keeping Russia out of the South Caucasus



 

After successfully expanding US influence in Azerbaijan and Armenia, the Trump administration should set its sights on Georgia.

Vice President JD Vance’s historic visit to the South Caucasus ended in controversy. Vance deleted a post on X that showed him paying respects at the Armenian Genocide Memorial in Yerevan, along with second lady Usha Vance. That made headlines and brought on accusations of “genocide denial.”


But focusing on the deleted post misses the point entirely. Vance is the first vice president and most senior US official to visit Armenia, and his trip forms an integral part of the Trump administration’s concerted effort to cement US influence and box out Russia in a region where Moscow was long the dominant player.

Above all, Vance sought to build on last August’s White House summit, where Armenia and Azerbaijan signed a peace agreement aimed at ending nearly 40 years of conflict.

Vance focused on fulfilling some of the bilateral trade deals promised to Armenian prime minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijani president Ilham Aliyev, which incentivized both to opt for peace last year. Their pact includes the creation of the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP)—a 27-mile rail and road project connecting Azerbaijan to its enclave of Nakhichevan through Armenia. TRIPP’s purpose is to provide a trade route between Central Asia and Europe that bypasses Russia and Iran. 

On February 9, Vance and Pashinyan signed a civilian nuclear cooperation agreement that includes $5 billion to replace Armenia’s Soviet nuclear power infrastructure and $4 billion in fuel and maintenance contracts. The agreement undercut a last-ditch cooperation offer by Russia’s state-owned nuclear concern Rosatom. 

A day earlier, Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov warned Armenian parliament speaker Alen Simonyan of the “risks of rapprochement with the West to the detriment of cooperation with traditional allies.” 

The following day, Vance visited Aliyev and signed a strategic partnership agreement encompassing economic and security cooperation. The deal includes defense sales, cooperation in artificial intelligence, energy security, and counterterrorism efforts.

In all, it was a successful trip to the region, but incomplete. For a good reason. Vance refused to dignify Georgia, the region’s third nation, with a visit. The country has been considered the South Caucasus’ Black Sea gateway and the traditional backbone of east–west transit. Now, it is drifting closer to Russia and China, cracking down on pro-democracy protesters, and making open US engagement politically uncomfortable. The clearest sign of this shift is the development of Anaklia Deep Sea Port.

The facility is intended to anchor Georgia’s role in the Black Sea as a critical node in the Middle Corridor trade route between Asia and Europe. In 2016, the Georgian government awarded the project to the Georgian-US-European-led Anaklia Development Consortium.

But in 2020, the Georgian government, led by the pro-Russian Georgian Dream party, terminated that contract. Instead, in May 2024, it selected a Chinese-Singaporean consortium centered on China Communications Construction Company for a 49 percent stake. That gives a key US adversary an enormous stake in a crucial piece of infrastructure. 

China’s commercial footprint in Georgia increasingly overlaps with firms linked to Beijing’s security ecosystem—such as the state’s use of Dahua surveillance cameras, Huawei telecom networks, and Nuctech security scanners. Meanwhile, Russia retains leverage through political, intelligence, and coercive influence operations, as well as threats of military intervention.

In all, the administration is getting it right in the South Caucasus, making the most of relations with Armenia and Azerbaijan. But President Donald Trump ignores Georgia at America’s risk. Washington doesn’t need to “bless” Georgia’s ruling party or grant it a high-level state visit to protect US interests, but it should keep targeted pressure on Tbilisi to reverse democratic backsliding. It is also important to expand support for civil society and media so that Georgia doesn’t become a durable platform for Russian 

With Georgia, a blend of incentive and threat is warranted. The incentive would be the prospect of American investment, encouraged by the Trump administration. The threat would be a clear sign of US determination to impose sanctions on Georgian Dream’s leadership and its enablers unless they hold new, transparent, internationally-monitored parliamentary elections and end the persecution of journalists and political opponents, making fair elections impossible. 

There is plenty of work left to do in the South Caucasus. The Armenia-Azerbaijan peace deal is still only a framework, and TRIPP will succeed or fail based on its implementation. Russia is maneuvering to stay relevant, pitching itself to Armenia as a better nuclear energy partner than the United States. Absent a new US approach to Georgia, the country will only deepen its partnership with America’s adversaries.

The next steps for the administration should be to bolster TRIPP with credible security and financing while approaching Tbilisi with the right mix of carrots and sticks to draw it out of Beijing and Moscow’s orbit. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What they don't tell you about South Africa...

  They don’t tell you that Black South Africans are not a single political, cultural, or economic group. They carry different languages, tribes, regions, classes, dreams, wounds, and worldviews.

Power, Sovereignty, and Economic Strategy- “Who Controls Africa’s Value Chains—and Why It Matters for Global Power?”

  Power, Sovereignty, and Economic Strategy “Who Controls Africa’s Value Chains—and Why It Matters for Global Power?” Control over value chains—not just resources or markets—has become the defining feature of modern economic power. In today’s global economy, influence is exercised less through territorial control and more through command over production systems : who extracts, who processes, who manufactures, who brands, and who distributes. Africa sits at the center of this global contest. Rich in critical resources yet structurally positioned at the lower end of value chains, the continent represents both an opportunity and a battleground for external powers. The central question is not simply what Africa produces—but who controls the value derived from it . 1. Understanding Value Chains as Instruments of Power A value chain encompasses the full lifecycle of a product: Resource extraction Processing and refinement Manufacturing Branding and intellectual property Distri...

World Cup 2026 scores and key stats for June 20 and June 21.

  World Cup 2026 scores and key stats for June 20 and June 21 . June 20 Results Group Match Score Main story F Netherlands vs Sweden Netherlands 5–1 Sweden Brobbey and Gakpo both scored twice. E Germany vs Ivory Coast Germany 2–1 Ivory Coast Deniz Undav came off the bench and scored twice, including the late winner. E Ecuador vs Curaçao 0–0 Curaçao goalkeeper Eloy Room made 15 saves , tying Tim Howard’s modern World Cup saves mark. F Tunisia vs Japan Japan 4–0 Tunisia Japan won the World Cup’s 1,000th match; Ayase Ueda scored twice. Netherlands 5–1 Sweden Stat Netherlands Sweden Possession 50.9% 49.1% Shots on goal 7 8 Shot attempts 10 16 Corners 2 5 Saves 7 2 Yellow cards 0 3 Scorers: Brian Brobbey 5’, 17’ , Cody Gakpo 47’, 54’ , Crysencio Summerville 89’ for Netherlands; Anthony Elanga 59’ for Sweden. ESPN lists Netherlands top of Group F on 4 points , level with Japan but ahead on the table ordering shown. Germany 2–1 Ivory Coast Stat Germany Ivory Coast Possession 55% 45% Tot...